Analysis
Why the Palestinian Authority Cannot Allow Free Speech
Middle East Forum
9.12.24
Image Source:
Illustration: Ahnaf Kalam, Middle East Forum Website
The Palestinian Authority (PA) enforces strict controls on free speech to suppress dissent and maintain its fragile political standing. Amid a collapsing political system, economic decline, and waning public support, the PA employs repressive measures, such as the 2017 Cybercrime Law, to silence critics and prevent unrest in the West Bank.
The article from the Middle East Forum outlines three main arguments regarding why the Palestinian Authority (PA) cannot allow free speech:
Political Fragility and Dissent Suppression: The PA relies on suppressing dissent to maintain its fragile political position. Free speech could amplify opposition voices, destabilizing its control over the West Bank.
Use of Legal and Repressive Measures: Laws like the 2017 Cybercrime Law are employed to target critics and journalists, illustrating the institutionalization of censorship to avoid public accountability and unrest.
Economic Decline and Public Discontent: With growing economic challenges and declining public support, the PA fears that allowing free speech would exacerbate social unrest and erode its already fragile legitimacy.Au
