Global Response
The Biden-Harris Administration, a 'Ceasefire' and a Palestinian State
Gatestone
30.10.24
Image Source:
Secretary of State Anthony Blinken met PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas in Ramallah on February 7, 2024 (WAFA)
The article from the Gatestone Institute presents three main arguments regarding the Biden-Harris administration's approach to a ceasefire and the establishment of a Palestinian state:
Palestinian Leadership's Reluctance for Peace: The article asserts that Palestinian leaders have historically avoided finalizing peace agreements with Israel. It suggests that leaders who have pursued peace have faced severe backlash, including being labeled as traitors or even assassinated, creating a strong disincentive for others to seek a lasting resolution.
Misallocation of International Aid: The article contends that substantial international donations intended for Palestinian development have been misused. Instead of fostering economic growth and improving living conditions, these funds have allegedly been diverted for other purposes, preventing regions like the West Bank and Gaza from achieving their full potential.
Challenges in Achieving a Sustainable Ceasefire: The article argues that proposed ceasefires often fail to address the root causes of the conflict. It claims that agreements tend to leave militant groups like Hamas intact, allowing them to regroup and rearm, which perpetuates the cycle of violence and undermines long-term peace efforts.